Which tool to analyze your sales calls? (Leexi, Modjo, tl;dv)
The market has exploded, and it's easy to get lost. An honest overview of the tools, their strengths, their limits, and the real question to ask before choosing one.
Updated on September 29, 2026
In 2026, analyzing your sales calls has never been easier. A dozen tools record, transcribe and summarize your conversations in minutes. The problem is no longer being able to do it, but choosing the tool that fits your need, and knowing what to do with the data once it's there.
There is no best tool in absolute terms. There is a best tool for a given goal. Here is how to situate the main options, honestly, to help you choose.
The three families of call analysis tools
Before comparing, you need to understand that these tools don't play in the same category:
- Notetakers: they transcribe and summarize. Simple, fast, perfect for not forgetting anything from a meeting. Examples: tl;dv, Fathom, Fireflies.
- Conversation intelligence platforms: they go further: objection detection, coaching, performance analysis. Examples: Modjo, Leexi, Claap.
- Revenue intelligence platforms: heavy, built for large sales teams, with forecasting and pipeline management. Examples: Gong, Clari.
Whether you're an independent coach, a founder, or a manager of a team of ten reps, your need isn't the same. Let's look at the concrete options.
A tour of the tools, strengths and limits
tl;dv
The simplestAn effective notetaker: transcription, summaries, video clip sharing. Very good for asynchronous collaboration and keeping a clean record of every call.
Limit: it captures, it doesn't dig. Little deep sales analysis (objection patterns across calls, buying signals).
Fathom
Light and freeMeeting summaries and action items, quick integration with Zoom and Google Meet, minimal setup. Ideal for small teams who want the essentials without complexity.
Limit: deliberately limited features. Meeting documentation more than sales analysis.
Leexi
Simple and compliantTranscription and meeting tracking, with good integration to phone systems (VoIP) and a focus on security and compliance. Handy for teams who want a no-frills solution.
Limit: stays centered on transcription and tracking. Advanced use of the data is limited.
Modjo
Team coachingA French platform, GDPR compliant, with solid coaching flows: dashboards, objection tracking, performance analysis, CRM integration. Built for sales teams that want to improve.
Limit: team and manager oriented. Less suited to the solo coach or founder juggling several different client contexts.
Claap
Async videoMore of a video wiki than an analysis engine: call library, clip sharing, keyword indexing. Excellent for cutting down meetings and sharing demos.
Limit: deep sales analysis isn't its core. Strong on sharing, lighter on sales insights.
Gong / Clari
EnterpriseThe heavyweights of revenue intelligence: large-scale analysis, forecasting, pipeline management. Powerful for a structured sales force.
Limit: expensive, slow to deploy (often several weeks of setup), oversized if you don't have a large team.
ChatGPT / Claude
The DIY optionYou can absolutely paste a transcript into ChatGPT or Claude and ask for a summary, the objections, the pains. Fast, flexible, and often surprisingly relevant on a single call.
Limit: generic AI starts from scratch every time. It doesn't know your customer, doesn't keep context from one call to the next, and forces you to re-explain who the prospect is on every prompt. You redo the work over and over.
| Your need | The right option |
|---|---|
| Not forgetting anything from a meeting | tl;dv, Fathom |
| Coaching a sales team | Modjo |
| Managing a large pipeline | Gong, Clari |
| Sharing video clips | Claap |
| Analyzing a call quickly | ChatGPT, Claude |
The real blind spot of all these tools
You may have noticed the common thread. All these tools analyze well. Some better than others, but overall, the "analysis" building block has become a standard.
The problem was never analyzing a call. It's what happens afterwards.
Once the analysis is done, where does the data go? Into a transcript. A dashboard. A summary you read once. A Claude chat you close. It dies, isolated, where it was produced.
Yet this data is worth gold once it accumulates. The objection heard on Monday should land in the customer's file, next to what they promised and where their deal stands. The objections of fifty calls should be countable. And the rep taking over an account should find what the customer said, word for word, without replaying three hours of recordings.
Instead, everyone keeps what they heard in their notes or in their head, customer by customer. That's where the real time, and the real value, is lost.
The right question to ask
When choosing a tool, people ask: "which one analyzes my calls best?" That's the wrong question, or at least an incomplete one.
The right question is: "which one makes that data reusable, customer by customer and across all my conversations?" Because analysis is only a starting point. What changes your day-to-day is data captured once resurfacing at the right moment, without you re-entering it.
This is exactly where Meidly sits
Every conversation, captured on Google Meet by the Chrome extension, uploaded as an audio or video file or through a Google Drive link, lands in its customer's file. We transcribe it, tag its key passages (objections, buying signals, churn risks), and update the customer's synthesis, their commitments with due dates and their deals. And the assistant answers across every conversation, citing each passage.
So, which tool should you choose?
If your only need is to keep a record of your meetings, a notetaker like tl;dv or Fathom is enough. If you coach a team, Modjo is solid. If you manage a large pipeline, Gong does the job.
But if your problem isn't analyzing, but turning what your customers say into concrete decisions, understanding who buys and why, tracking what was promised, knowing what comes back from one customer to the next, then an analysis tool alone won't be enough. You need a place where that data accumulates, customer by customer.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best tool to analyze sales calls?
There is no universal best tool. To not forget anything from a meeting, a notetaker like tl;dv or Fathom is enough. To coach a team, Modjo is solid. For a large pipeline, Gong. The real criterion isn't just analysis quality, but what you do with the data next.
Can you analyze sales calls with ChatGPT or Claude?
Yes, pasting a transcript into ChatGPT or Claude often gives good results on a single call. The limit is that generic AI starts from scratch every time: it doesn't know your customer, doesn't keep context from one call to the next, and forces you to re-explain everything on every prompt.
What's the difference between a notetaker and a conversation intelligence platform?
A notetaker (tl;dv, Fathom) transcribes and summarizes. A conversation intelligence platform (Modjo, Leexi, Claap) goes further: objection detection, coaching, performance analysis across all calls.
Is analyzing your calls enough to sell better?
No. Analysis is a starting point. The real value comes from what happens to the data next: attached to each customer's file, with their commitments and deals, and searchable across every conversation, each answer citing the exact passage. That's where most tools stop.