Modjo alternatives: the options that fit your team and budget
Modjo is a good product. What blocks people is rarely its quality, it is the price and the seat floor. Here are the real alternatives, and the question nobody asks before choosing.
Updated on September 29, 2026
Nobody looks for an alternative to a tool that works badly. People look for an alternative to a tool that is too expensive, too heavy, or sized for a team they do not have.
Let us say it plainly first: Modjo is a good product. It sits around 4.7 on G2 and 4.5 on Capterra, which is not the score of a tool that disappoints. Users point to call replay, the library organised by topic, and the sharing of best practices.
So if you are here, it is probably not because Modjo is bad. It is because it is not built for your situation.
Why people look for a Modjo alternative
- Pricing is quote only. No public grid, so no way to know whether it fits you before talking to a sales rep.
- There is a seat floor. Modjo targets structured sales teams, not a solo founder or a pair.
- The commitment is annual. Hard to try it for six weeks and see.
- The product is built for team management. Call review, coaching, rep comparison. With nobody to coach, you pay for a module you will never open.
The figures circulating publicly sit around 99 euros per user per month, with a team minimum. Sources disagree on that minimum, and since the grid is not published, treat these numbers as an order of magnitude to verify, not as a reference.
The alternatives, sorted by actual need
Leexi
Closest, cheaperConversation analysis with transcription, summaries and topic detection. European positioning, quick onboarding, solid multilingual approach. This is the most direct alternative if you want the same family of tool without the entry ticket.
Limit: you stay in the same logic: the tool analyses your calls and stops there. What you do with the objections it finds is still your problem.
Claap
Public pricing, framework scoringAutomatically scores every call against your sales framework, MEDDIC, SPICED or your own. Published pricing, around 32 and 60 dollars per user per month depending on the plan, so you can decide without going through a sales rep.
Limit: framework scoring assumes you have one, and that it is stable. On a sales cycle that is still moving, the score says very little.
tl;dv
The lightestTranscription, summaries, shareable video clips. A free tier exists. Perfect if your real need is keeping a clean record and forgetting nothing from a meeting.
Limit: it captures, it does not dig. No cross reading of what comes back from one call to the next.
Fathom
Free to startAn effective notetaker with a generous free plan. The right first step when you want to stop taking notes by hand without committing to anything.
Limit: same limit as tl;dv, and almost no deep commercial analysis.
Gong
The opposite problemThe revenue intelligence reference, with forecasting and pipeline steering.
Limit: if you find Modjo too heavy and too expensive, Gong is a notch above on both. It is not an alternative, it is a step up.
| Tool | Who it is for, and at what price |
|---|---|
| Modjo | Structured team with a manager. Quote based, annual commitment. |
| Leexi | Same need, tighter budget. Around 39 euros per user. |
| Claap | Those who want a public price. Roughly 32 to 60 dollars per user. |
| tl;dv | Keeping a clean record. Free tier available. |
| Fathom | Starting without paying. Free plan. |
| Gong | Large teams steering a pipeline. Clearly above. |
The prices above are those published or reported at the time this article was written. Check with the vendor before deciding, they move.
The question nobody asks before choosing
All these tools answer the same question: what was said during this call? None of them answers the next one, which is the one that changes your day to day: what do I do with it?
You come out with an objection identified in eleven conversations. Good. It ends up in a summary nobody reopens, and the answer to that objection keeps being improvised, call after call.
Analysing for the sake of analysing
- One summary per call, rarely reread
- Objections stay inside the analysis tool
- Nobody knows how often they come back
- Every new call starts from a blank page
Using what was actually said
- Every conversation lands in the right customer's file
- Key passages are tagged: objection, buying signal, churn risk
- Objections are counted across all conversations
- Commitments come with a due date and a follow up
This is exactly where Meidly sits
And let us be honest: Meidly does not replace Modjo. We do not try to be the best tool to replay a call or coach a rep. Every conversation lands in its customer's file, which keeps an up to date synthesis, the commitments made and the deals detected. And the assistant answers across all conversations, citing the exact passage and counting recurring themes rather than guessing them.
So which one should you pick?
If you manage a team and the budget follows, stay on Modjo. Looking for an alternative will cost you more than it saves.
If the need is the same but the entry ticket blocks you, look at Leexi or Claap, the latter having the advantage of a published price.
If you mostly want to stop taking notes, Fathom or tl;dv are enough, and cost nothing to start.
And if your real problem is not analysing your calls but knowing what to do with them next, none of these tools will solve it, whatever the price. That is a different category of product.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Modjo cost?
Modjo does not publish a pricing grid, pricing is quote based with an annual commitment and a minimum number of seats. Publicly reported figures sit around 99 euros per user per month, but with no official grid, treat that as an order of magnitude to confirm with the vendor.
What is the best free alternative to Modjo?
Fathom and tl;dv both offer a free tier. They are not functional equivalents: they transcribe and summarise, without the cross call analysis or the coaching features of Modjo. To keep a record of your meetings without paying, they are more than enough.
Leexi or Claap, which one replaces Modjo best?
Leexi is the closest functionally, with a European positioning and a price around 39 euros per user. Claap stands out with a public grid, roughly 32 to 60 dollars depending on the plan, and automatic scoring of every call against your sales framework. If you want to decide without talking to a sales rep, Claap has the edge.
Is Meidly a Modjo alternative?
No, and claiming otherwise would be dishonest. Modjo is there to replay, analyse and coach on calls. Meidly gathers what your customers say into one file per customer, with its synthesis, commitments and deals, and an assistant that answers by citing the passages. The two can coexist: one looks at the call, the other uses what it contains.
Do you really need a paid tool to analyse your calls?
Not if you have few calls. Pasting a transcript into ChatGPT or Claude often gives a good result on a single conversation. The limit shows up with volume: a general purpose AI starts from scratch every time, keeps nothing from one call to the next, and forces you to re explain everything.