👋

Log in
Back to the blog
Call analysisAugust 27, 2026·9 min

Modjo alternatives: the options that fit your team size and budget

Modjo is well rated and that is not the issue. If you are looking for an alternative, it is usually a budget or team size question. An honest tour of the options, with prices, limits, and the criterion that actually matters.

Nobody looks for an alternative to a tool that works badly. People look for an alternative to a tool that is too expensive, too heavy, or sized for a team they do not have.

Let us say it plainly first: Modjo is a good product. It sits around 4.7 on G2 and 4.5 on Capterra, which is not the score of a tool that disappoints. Users point to call replay, the library organised by topic, and the sharing of best practices.

So if you are here, it is probably not because Modjo is bad. It is because it is not built for your situation.

Why people look for a Modjo alternative

  • Pricing is quote only. No public grid, so no way to know whether it fits you before talking to a sales rep.
  • There is a seat floor. Modjo targets structured sales teams, not a solo founder or a pair.
  • The commitment is annual. Hard to try it for six weeks and see.
  • The product is built for team management. Call review, coaching, rep comparison. With nobody to coach, you pay for a module you will never open.

The figures circulating publicly sit around 99 euros per user per month, with a team minimum. Sources disagree on that minimum, and since the grid is not published, treat these numbers as an order of magnitude to verify, not as a reference.

The alternatives, sorted by actual need

Leexi

Closest, cheaper

Conversation analysis with transcription, summaries and topic detection. European positioning, quick onboarding, solid multilingual approach. This is the most direct alternative if you want the same family of tool without the entry ticket.

Limit: you stay in the same logic: the tool analyses your calls and stops there. What you do with the objections it finds is still your problem.

Claap

Public pricing, framework scoring

Automatically scores every call against your sales framework, MEDDIC, SPICED or your own. Published pricing, around 32 and 60 dollars per user per month depending on the plan, so you can decide without going through a sales rep.

Limit: framework scoring assumes you have one, and that it is stable. On a sales cycle that is still moving, the score says very little.

tl;dv

The lightest

Transcription, summaries, shareable video clips. A free tier exists. Perfect if your real need is keeping a clean record and forgetting nothing from a meeting.

Limit: it captures, it does not dig. No cross reading of what comes back from one call to the next.

Fathom

Free to start

An effective notetaker with a generous free plan. The right first step when you want to stop taking notes by hand without committing to anything.

Limit: same limit as tl;dv, and almost no deep commercial analysis.

Gong

The opposite problem

The revenue intelligence reference, with forecasting and pipeline steering.

Limit: if you find Modjo too heavy and too expensive, Gong is a notch above on both. It is not an alternative, it is a step up.

ToolWho it is for, and at what price
ModjoStructured team with a manager. Quote based, annual commitment.
LeexiSame need, tighter budget. Around 39 euros per user.
ClaapThose who want a public price. Roughly 32 to 60 dollars per user.
tl;dvKeeping a clean record. Free tier available.
FathomStarting without paying. Free plan.
GongLarge teams steering a pipeline. Clearly above.

The prices above are those published or reported at the time this article was written. Check with the vendor before deciding, they move.

The question nobody asks before choosing

All these tools answer the same question: what was said during this call? None of them answers the next one, which is the one that changes your day to day: what do I do with it?

You come out with an objection identified in eleven conversations. Good. It ends up in a summary nobody reopens, while you rewrite your prospecting messages from intuition, in another tab.

Analysing for the sake of analysing

  • One summary per call, rarely reread
  • Objections stay inside the analysis tool
  • Targeting and messages get rewritten from intuition
  • Every new call starts from a blank page

Using what was actually said

  • Signals accumulate in a single base
  • Objections feed the portrait of who buys
  • That portrait becomes targeting criteria
  • Those criteria become message angles

This is exactly where Meidly sits

And let us be honest: Meidly does not replace Modjo. It does not try to be the best tool to replay a call or coach a rep. It starts from what is said in your conversations to build your client avatar, turn it into targeting criteria, then into messages. The data is captured once and serves the whole chain, instead of dying in a summary.

See Meidly call analysis

So which one should you pick?

If you manage a team and the budget follows, stay on Modjo. Looking for an alternative will cost you more than it saves.

If the need is the same but the entry ticket blocks you, look at Leexi or Claap, the latter having the advantage of a published price.

If you mostly want to stop taking notes, Fathom or tl;dv are enough, and cost nothing to start.

And if your real problem is not analysing your calls but knowing what to do with them next, none of these tools will solve it, whatever the price. That is a different category of product.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Modjo cost?

Modjo does not publish a pricing grid, pricing is quote based with an annual commitment and a minimum number of seats. Publicly reported figures sit around 99 euros per user per month, but with no official grid, treat that as an order of magnitude to confirm with the vendor.

What is the best free alternative to Modjo?

Fathom and tl;dv both offer a free tier. They are not functional equivalents: they transcribe and summarise, without the cross call analysis or the coaching features of Modjo. To keep a record of your meetings without paying, they are more than enough.

Leexi or Claap, which one replaces Modjo best?

Leexi is the closest functionally, with a European positioning and a price around 39 euros per user. Claap stands out with a public grid, roughly 32 to 60 dollars depending on the plan, and automatic scoring of every call against your sales framework. If you want to decide without talking to a sales rep, Claap has the edge.

Is Meidly a Modjo alternative?

No, and claiming otherwise would be dishonest. Modjo is there to replay, analyse and coach on calls. Meidly starts from what is said in your conversations to build your client avatar, your targeting criteria and your messages. The two can coexist: one looks at the call, the other uses what it contains.

Do you really need a paid tool to analyse your calls?

Not if you have few calls. Pasting a transcript into ChatGPT or Claude often gives a good result on a single conversation. The limit shows up with volume: a general purpose AI starts from scratch every time, keeps nothing from one call to the next, and forces you to re explain everything.

What if the analysis tool was not the problem?

See on your own calls what changes when the data travels instead of dying in a summary. No commitment, no credit card.